Rss

Lack of college leads to “Real World” drama

Septembre Russell

 

Lately it appears as if going to college is a popular road to take, a ritual or rite of passage in some cases.

Standard operating procedure requires you go to preschool, middle and high school, working your way through the education cycle and ultimately arriving in college.

Maybe that statement carries such validity to me because of the academic nature of my surroundings. The desire of attending college is becoming a hideous trend coupled with actual attendance.   

When I visit home, I hear my friends who are not in college habitually enter into conversations about their intent to eventually go. The topic comes up not because we are stressing about how life is dismal or the increase in gas prices.

These conversations are completely unsolicited, which makes me uncomfortable because my college acceptance seemingly makes me superior. I do not feel superior; it is well understood that a college education is not guaranteed for everyone nor is college meant for everyone. 

At home, my friends welcome me into their apartments and smile when I tell them how proud I am of them for having their lives in order, juggling full-time jobs, apartments, cars, bills and pets even; and all at 19 or 20.  I would never have imagined owning a pet at 20. I always knew I would not have one because I’d be in college. 

These are the friends who graduated from high school a year before me or dropped out and flaunted their new lives, absent of homework and tests, in my face.
   It was hard continuing under the constraints of school nights, and, even though my options were limitless, I could have gone out and had fun with the graduates without any kind of objection. Instead, I chose to be mindful of the fact that although life was peachy for them in the short term, the long term would not offer any fruit.
     Now they are all in a period of regret and hindsight. Now they are all living free from homework between the shifts of those full-time jobs, because now it is necessary to work to have                      a home. 

As if having a limited window of time to accomplish things and have the fun they had post graduation were enough, the dramatic immaturity and high school gossip comes back into play.

I always feel like I have traveled back in time once reunited with them. My entire visit turns from the eventful time I had planned for to a real life episode of “Gossip Girl.” 
   There are people who covet the benefits and allure of a college education.

“Sweetheart,” I tell them, “this vacation is comparable to a mere commercial break for me. You will still be here doing the same things day in and day out, while in a few weeks I will be           learning.”

I cannot help but think, “My friend could be a junior right now, almost done with one of the most important accomplishments of his or her entire life instead of regretting not going to college directly after high school and realizing the benefits of that poor decision do not exist.” 

I am not implying that my friends, or yours, are less capable and their lack of postsecondary education will mar them in life.

I am simply saying my time spent in the dredges of pettiness paired with my materialistic peers makes me appreciate my decision to go to college following high school. 

They may have all the things they want right now, but what will they have later?

Political apathy is your own fault

Jordan Jacobo

Last week, I was eating a hurried lunch in Dillin Hall with a group of my friends when one of them turned to me and said, “I don’t think I should vote.”

Of course I was appalled. Not vote?

“It’s your duty,” I told her.

She didn’t seem interested. My heart dropped. I didn’t know what else to say. I fear that she’s not the only one who feels this way.

In the midst of two campaigns increasingly concerned with mudslinging and a travelling press corps incessantly analyzing the horse-race, young voters are becoming disillusioned.

What began as messages of hope and leadership have devolved to little more than campaigns based on doublespeak and half-truths, and democracy has suffered.

College students—that means you—are apathetic when it comes to politics. With campaigns based on glamour and rhetoric, the issues have been buried, and so has the magic of the election.

My friend told me she didn’t feel qualified to vote because she wasn’t informed. So much for the 24/7 news cycle.

It is a sad day in America when our citizenry doesn’t know what this election is about. No, it is not about Paris Hilton and “lipstick on a pig.” It is about issues.

The economy. Energy. Social Security. Healthcare. Two wars in the Middle East. Do you have an opinion? Do your research.

It is not enough to look up commentary on Digg or watch parodies on YouTube or join the Facebook group. Students today are a product of a vain culture that cares more about what you broadcast then what you believe in. It is time for us to change that.

You say one vote doesn’t matter? It seems too many students have that opinion. In the 2004 presidential election, only 46 percent of the 25 million U.S. citizens age 18-24 voted. That means more than 12 million non-voters were our age. In case you need a refresher, George W. Bush defeated John Kerry by fewer than 4 million votes that year. This year’s race between Barack Obama and John McCain could be even closer.

As a citizen of this country, it is more than just your responsibility to vote; It is your lifeblood. The vote is what keeps your freedom ensured, if only for one day every four years.

In the Information Age, saying you do not know about the issues only means you have not looked yet. Take democracy and this country into your own hands and care about what happens on election day.

Do your research. Look up each candidate’s policies. Do some fact-checking (politifact.com and factcheck.org are great resources). Watch the debates and not just the post-debate analysis.

For the love of Thomas Jefferson, don’t vote with the crowd. Make up your own decision. If popular culture was a political party, this year’s ticket would be made up of Lauren Conrad and Dramatic Chipmunk.

All this country asks of you is that for one day, for one checkmark, you think for yourself to vote and make a decision that you can stand by.

Here’s a challenge to every student reading this: Register yourself and get three other friends to register to vote then get informed and then cast your ballot and make your voice heard from McMinnville all the way to Washington, D.C.

Do you think you could take the time off from watching “Friends” reruns to do that?

You only get what you give

Kelley Hungerford

Dear Linfield students,

I love you dearly, but man alive am I tired of hearing you all complain about not getting any mail.

“I hardly check my unit box because it’s always empty and that’s too depressing for me, and whine, complain, whine,” I hear you grumble. Well Withnell-shunners, there is a reason you never get mail: You don’t send any letters.

When was the last time you sent an e-mail? This morning?  When did you last receive a text message? Five minutes ago? Are you even reading this or are you sitting in Dillin trying to look informed with the Review open in front of you but really phone in hand, texting? I am offended. Close your electronic gadget before it explodes from use and think about this: When did you last send a letter? And no, your credit card bill does not count.

Every two or three days I check my unit box and there is always something in it. My granny in Chicago sends me weekly postcards. My friend in Colorado mails me letters and CDs every few days. My mom ships me care packages a few times a semester, and my high school friends mail me triweekly. Jealous? You don’t have to be. Just pick up a pen and some paper, even a Dillin napkin will do, and get writing.

Write someone telling them they should write you back so you can give a hearty “Whoohoo!” in Withnell Commons  when you discover something in your unit box other than cobwebs. Need to break up with your boy- or girlfriend but don’t want to speak to them ever again? Write them. Send them a singing card that plays *NSYNC’s “Bye Bye Bye.” Even this is better than a text message break-up, as I’m sure Jeff Primozich would agree. Well, maybe.

I write to my family, friends and even my favorite high school teachers. The content doesn’t have to be serious. It is much nicer to receive humorous post than a serious manuscript. For instance, take the solemn “I miss you” topic. Monday, I received a letter from a friend stating, “I miss you so much and when I say I love you, I don’t mean that I have sex dreams about you…No, I dream of getting really old and scaring young children with you…I love you so much it is stupid. I will write you so often it will piss off the post man.”

Trust me, this is more engaging than, “I love and miss you, bye.”

“But stamps are expensive,” you say. So what? So is my phone bill. Stop calling me. You don’t need stamps to send in-campus mail. Send me candy. I like Twix. Seriously, though, Linfield, send out mail. It is one of the simplest, most pleasant moments of. It doesn’t take much effort, and the only way you are going to get mail is to send some.

Happy letter writing.

Satire serves crucial role

Amber McKenna

 Editor in chief

Dominic Baez

 Managing editor

 

“I believe global warming is caused by man,” Amy Poehler, as Hillary Clinton, said.

“And I believe it’s just God hugging us closer,” Tina Fey, as Sarah Palin, said.

This was just one of the exchanges on the much discussed Saturday Night Live sketch, broadcast by NBC on Sept. 13. The sketch featured Poehler as Senator and former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., and Fey as Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, Republican vice presidential candidate.

For those who missed the show, the sketch presented Clinton and Palin discussing sexism side by side at a conference. The subject quickly turned to the differences between the women, and they could not be more transparent.

On one side there was Poehler, explaining how she supports diplomacy for foreign policy and believes global warming is caused by man. Then there was Fey, who countered Clinton’s arguments with ones that were juvenile at best. Their exchanges suggested  Palin lacks Clinton’s substance.

The best part of the sketch was how it served as a political check on Palin. True, Fey’s sketch did not precisely reflect the Republican VP nominee’s stand on the issues but then again, it was not supposed to. Satire has a disturbing way of being critical of politicians in the most delicious way.

To those who were offended, get over it. This is satire, not reality. Do you really think it is unfair for SNL, the show that ridiculed and attacked Monica Lewinsky until they had enough footage for a “best of” episode, to ridicule Palin? It’s comedy. It picks on a target’s weak points, the ones that make us laugh. That is what it is supposed to do. But it served a greater purpose too: It allowed the general public, and those of us who have not been keeping up with the election, to see some potential flaws in McCain’s running mate.

Those who have watched Palin discussing politics, especially foreign diplomacy, know it is difficult. It seems as if she is struggling to think of answers to questions she  never considered. Compare that to Sen. Barack Obama, Democratic presidential candidate: When he is put on the spot, he knows what he is talking about. The contrast is striking and crystal clear.

While this editorial is not meant to attack Palin, it is meant to show the differences between the candidates. We know she started at the bottom and worked her way to the top by being better, not prettier. She did her job at the top by being smarter and tougher than those who stood in her way. However, it is only fair to think the candidates should be at equal levels. Palin is not. She’s not incapable; she just doesn’t know much about the world outside Alaska. This is a significant fact if you want to be next in line to a 72-year-old president.

Also remember that SNL is not the first to comment on Palin in such a way. However, the show was one of the first to do it so robustly. The sketch was funny, but  that is what you would expect from Fey and Poehler. It was so funny it apparently caused McCain advisor Carly Fiorina to completely lose her sense of humor.

“The portrait was very dismissive of the substance of Sarah Palin,” Fiorina said to MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell. “And so in that sense they were defining Hillary Clinton as very substantive and Sarah Palin as totally superficial. I think that continues the line of argument that is disrespectful in the extreme, and, yes, I would say sexist in the sense that just because Sarah Palin has different views than Hillary Clinton does not mean she lacks substance.”

Obviously she wants more respectful satire. Right.

The Review, however, agrees with Poehler: “I invite the media to grow a pair, and if you can’t, I will lend you mine.”

Do not hold any punches when it comes to what is important, and that goes for everyone.

Apology unnecessary from VMA host

Rachael Palinkas

 

I didn’t watch the Video Music Awards this year, and I can’t remember the last time I did. Regardless, I heard all about the scandal of the Jonas Brothers and their promise rings.

I thought it was ridiculous when the host, Russell Brand, was criticized for making jokes about the fact that the group wears promise rings, promising to abstain from sex until marriage.

More bizarre was that others who were given awards or presented them, such as Jordin Sparks, spoke out on behalf of the Jonas Brothers and others who wear promise rings,
including herself.

I think they must have forgotten that Brand is a comedian and it is his job to make people laugh, and I am sure that plenty of people were laughing. You see the same thing on any awards show: People are made fun of for their differences and unique quirks and that is just the way it goes.

I couldn’t believe that Brand had to give a public apology for the things he said about the Jonas Brothers and their rings. For example, he held up a similar ring and remarked about how he had stolen their virginities. Perhaps people are so upset about this because they think it is admirable that these young kids decided to make this promise.

Let’s face it, the idea of waiting to have sex until you’re married is pretty outdated. Look at the new ABC Family hit show, “The Secret Life of the American Teenager,” where a young girl has sex for the first time and ends up pregnant. It just goes to show that sex is a part of life for many teenagers, and we shouldn’t go on pretending that it’s not.

I think that their personal decision to wear promise rings is no different than someone’s personal decision to be a
Scientologist or to be Republican, and plenty of people publicly make fun of others for these decisions, yet I have never seen someone made to give a
public apology for such jokes,
so why now?

Freshmen: It’s OK to be selfish

Jeff Primozich

With this year’s freshman class being one of the largest in Linfield history, there is bound to be a greater number of incoming freshmen involved in long-distance relationships. You know, the kind where you chose Linfield and she or he chose another school or has yet to graduate from high school. As someone who managed to maintain a relationship for three-and-a-half years under these circumstances only to see that relationship end with a text message, take my advice: now is not the time in your life to struggle and sacrifice to keep that love alive.

This may be hard to swallow for those of you who get swept up in the unadulterated pleasures of young love. It is important to remember that this has no bearing on the feelings you and your significant other share. However,  the power of college to challenge and change all of your current values, beliefs and feelings is unprecedented and irrefutable. This has to do with the reality of the situation.

You need to ask yourself: What would you do when you plan a trip to visit your girlfriend or boyfriend and at the last minute your friends decide to take a road trip to California for the weekend? What are you going to do when you’ve planned to spend Christmas break with the one you love and your roommate invites you to Mexico, all expenses paid? What are you going to do when you are supposed to spend summer vacation at home so you and the person you are with can spend time together and you get accepted to the summer internship that you’ve been dreaming of? What are you going to sacrifice? When you need to plan time to spend with the person you love because the distance between you is longer than a walk from one dorm to another, those visits are going to become a burden on you, especially when you are missing out on the fun things your friends on campus are doing, even if it’s a spur-of-the-moment Winco run at one in the morning.

Don’t neglect the power of regret. Let me preface this by saying that regret has a very pejorative connotation, one that I would like to ignore. Instead, I choose to use the word to describe the realization that the costs of one action (spending time with your girlfriend or boyfriend) are higher than the benefits received from that action—that is to say, that there was still pleasure had.

One of the biggest problems of a long-distance relationship is the added pressure to make the absolute best of every moment you spend together. When you seldomly see each other, you treasure those planned weekly visits. But as time wears on and you start to realize that you are missing out on other activities, those visits start feeling more mandatory and less voluntary. What I mean by this is that you convince yourself that you need to see each other as regularly and as frequently as possible. When you realize that you are missing out on things you would like to do, you start feeling a constant and insatiable desire to make every moment you spend together the best it can be—as if making up for what you are forgoing. When you don’t have a good day together or fight or one of you is just in a funk, you start to regret giving up time with your friends for time with them. The worst thing you can do to yourself and the one you love is let that regret grow into resentment, and the best way to avoid this from happening is to never sacrifice the things you want to do in the first place.

The relationships you have, whether they are with friends and family or your boyfriend or girlfriend, will always be an important part of your life. And while I may be more cynical of long-distance relationships than I once I was, it is still important to remember that right now is a time in your life where you need to take advantage of all the freedom and opportunities you have. You must be selfish with your college experience and get the absolute most out of it. Although you may love someone, you can’t let that love be a barricade to the opportunities you will have as a student here. People always say you must sacrifice for love but what is more true is that if you share true love with someone, those feelings will stay strong even if that love is what you must sacrifice.

Teeny bopper baby boom

Brianne Ries

Teenagers get pregnant all the time, it’s not just Bristol Palin and Jamie Lynn Spears. Shocking, I know.

So why is it that when high-profile teenagers are expecting more than a high school diploma the media latches on and refuses to let go?

Thanks to the media coverage of these high-profile teenage pregnancies, misconceptions are created about how “easy” it is to be a teenage mom.

In the case of Palin and Spears, an odd fairytale is portrayed, showing that with pregnancy comes marriage and a happy family.

Don’t get me wrong; that can happen. But in reality, it is rare. The media doesn’t ever focus on teenage moms who are doing it on their own, barely making ends meet to provide a loving and stable environment for their baby.

Not to say that Palin and Spears haven’t had their share of difficulties, but at the end of the day their high-profile lifestyles make them pretty well off.

The whole fiasco surrounding Bristol is, quite frankly, ridiculous. As far as the hype in the media realm, she is not the one that is going to be governing the country, so let her be at peace and plan her wedding.

I seriously doubt that this will have that detrimental of an effect on Sarah Palin’s role if she is elected vice president. Maybe the fact that she has her own clan of kids makes it seem challenging, but parents balance career and family all the time.

I believe that questioning the parenting skills of young Palin’s or Spears’ wayward parents is not fair. You can’t have a leash on your teens 24 hours a day (maybe a tracking device, but that is a completely different story). You remember what it was like to be a teen: moody, angst-filled, waiting for every opportunity to defy your parents. That is what teenagers do.

What I do question is if in light of all of this, Sarah Palin’s views on abstinence-only education have shifted. Chances are probably not, and that is very distressing.

Sarah Palin has advocated abstinence-only programs and look how well that went. Her own daughter is the epitome of what happens when teens aren’t taught the basics of real sex education. Somewhat ironic, don’t you think?

Teens have sex. Teens get pregnant. A shotgun wedding is not going to cover up the fact that, gasp, kids have sex before marriage. That is just reality. If politicians could stop being so naïve and step up to the plate, our teens and our country as a whole would be a lot better off.

Pandora opens new music possibilities

Dominic Baez

 

Last week, I was introduced to the fantastic Web site Pandora.com. I cannot express how amazing this site is.

Let me explain: Pandora.com is a site that compiles playlists that attune to your personal musical tastes. You enter an artist you are particularly fond of, such as Rihanna or Ne-Yo, and the search engine puts together a playlist featuring artists who are similar in musical style.

I am stunned at how amazing the system is at figuring out what songs and artists suit me best. When I first put in Rihanna, the computer played “Disturbia,” which I love. It then followed it up with Ne-Yo’s “So Sick.” While I love the song too, I was a little confused as to why it was being played, considering how different it is from the previous song. But, to my amazement, there is a feature on the site that explains why each song was chosen, citing reasons such as the similarities between the ability to dance to it, whether it has the same rhythm or if it is the same musical genre. This combination of attributes greatly helps in making my personal playlist, well, personal.

To top it off, the service is free, as it is heavily sponsored by a multitude of companies trying to get your business. To be honest, though, I can totally deal with a ridiculous amount of advertisements as long as they do not pop up everywhere, which they don’t.

Another awesome feature of the Web site is that one is able to make many different playlists or stations each focusing on a different artist, genre or style. Right now, I have close to 15 playlists, featuring every genre from techno to rhythm and blues. No, I am not addicted.

There are some negative attributes to the site, though. One is that you cannot repeat a song. Once you play the song, you must wait until the system replays it on its own accord before you can hear it again, or you have to create a new station dedicated to that particular artist. Although you have the ability to give a song a “thumbs down,” which results in the song never begin played on that station again, Pandora’s licensing laws only allows you to skip so many song before you are forced to potentially listen to songs you do not want to
listen to.

I guess you can only have so much of a good thing, right? Despite the petty annoyances, I highly recommend everyone to at least try the site out. You might hate it or you might just fall in love with it. Trust me: Hearing is believing.

New semester, same high prices

Amber McKenna

Editor in chief

Dominic Baez

Managing editor

 

Welcome to your greatest school year thus far. It would not be untrue to say many of us Linfield students anticipate the return to campus, like a kid on (insert your preferred holiday here).

 

 

 

You may need one book or five or 10, and each comes with its own substantial price tag. So why are textbooks so expensive? Over at Barnes and Noble, I can get the latest 900-page New York Times bestseller for $19.99. What makes textbooks so different? The answer is everything.

According to Maketextbooksaffordable.com, a campaign to reduce textbook costs, the textbook market is a broken one. There is a lack of competition with the textbook industry, as opposed to the mainstream book market.

Students also have little market power because professors decide which books pupils will purchase,

maketextbooksaffordable.com writes. It is highly unusual that professors think about the cost of a textbook before they assign it in their course.

These essential books are printed on glossy paper, with many graphs and images in color ink, none of which are cheaply produced.

It is a co-ed custom to sell used textbook to peers; however, with a new edition of each book coming out annually, old editions are quickly devalued and no longer recommend by professors.

A Congress-mandated study by the U.S. Department of Education on the affordability of college textbooks came out last year. It suggested ways to improve the situation, including increasing library resources, implementing textbook rental programs, improving financial aid policies and utilizing technologies such as electronic textbooks.

Textbook rental is definitely the secret of
the year. Chegg.com and
bookrenter.com are just a few of the sites where students can rent their textbook for a term at a fraction of the price it costs to
buy new.

Predictably, the next wave to save money and resources on textbooks will be with sites like etext.com, which publishes electronic textbooks and course material on its private site.

Until textbooks start coming cheaply, we recommend saving the old-fashioned way: share with a friend, borrow from the library or take out a loan and pay for your text in 10 years. Study hard Linfield.

 

 

 

 

Being away from the friends you are with constantly during the school year is hard and it always feels great to be back among them. However, when classes start back up the reality of the situation sets in: You are back to learn and with that comes certain responsibilities. One of the least favorites of these is buying books. 

 

 

 

 

 

Take pride in education, experience

Amber McKenna

Editor in chief

Dominic Baez

Managing editor

 

On June 1, the parents of you graduating seniors will be snapping pictures from every angle, relatives you barely know will send you cards and presents and you will be challenged with the task of uncovering what “next” means for you.

The college-grad experience is now surrounding Linfield seniors. It may seem as if the whole ordeal is a hassle and you are ready to leave the college life behind, but don’t take it for granted—many students do not make it to graduation day.

The Education Trust is an online database, www.collegeresults.org, featuring graduation rates, broken down by demographics, of practically every institution in the country. According to the Web site, Linfield, based off its compiled statistics up to 2006, has a 72.8 percent graduation rate.

Everyone notices when students don’t return to campus in the spring or the fall. Reasons include financial diffuculties, low grades, transferring schools, new pursuits or a mental breakdown. Whatever the reason, nearly 30 percent of students who start out at Linfield do not graduate.

It is a shame to see this occur in a society where education is so important. Our world today does not match the one our parents grew up in.

It is well-known that college graduates make twice as much money as those who only complete high school. It is also sad to think that many are not fortunate enough to have the college experience at all. Having all of your friends living within a 10-minute walk of you does not generally happen in the real world, though shows like “Friends” deceive us. Other perks you might miss from the college experience include free concerts and entertainment, free or cheap food and knowing you can track anyone down through Facebook.

The 72.8 percent of students who do graduate and walk across the stage in the Oak Grove should be proud of themselves. Be proud for sticking it out through hard semesters and living to see the end result after four or five years.

Although the majority of seniors may be leaving Linfield without a job or any sort of plan, know this: Linfield has done its best to prepare you for life after college. Through internships, leadership roles in clubs and organizations and the experiences of college, you are ready to make Linfield, your family and yourself proud.